Charles Murray: I'm thinking of organizing an informal meetup of the PACT team on TS so we can start working on decks and maybe play a few games. Thoughts?
Jun 5, 2014 20:49:40 GMT
octamurk: If each player is responsible for a single battlegroup/deck then this is going to fizzle out really quick
Jun 5, 2014 20:52:56 GMT
Anonamous_Quinn: Yeah, that's a good point octamurk. Even if people have two decks or something it'll still flop quickly. People won't be able to play because their deck didn't attack, while next turn they won't be available.
Jun 5, 2014 21:23:11 GMT
Anonamous_Quinn: I worry we're overestimating player numbers as well.
Jun 5, 2014 21:23:20 GMT
Charles Murray: I want to know what Sunny thinks about that particular issue. I'd like to keep with assigning players to BLUFOR and REDFOR, given we want to formulate cohesive plans and plots.
Jun 5, 2014 21:35:10 GMT
Charles Murray: Given the faction sign up thread, we currently have 2 people on PACT and 5 people on NATO.
Jun 5, 2014 21:36:44 GMT
Sunny: It is a tough one to work around. It is most desirable to have players assigned to a single battlegroup and move it themselves for roleplay reasons. However, it is clear that this will deter players from contributing often or turning up to match nights.
Jun 5, 2014 23:14:58 GMT
Charles Murray: By the way, can you guys on NATO/PACT see your respective NATO/PACT boards and post in them?
Jun 5, 2014 23:35:05 GMT
Sunny: Added you on Steam, Charles
Jun 5, 2014 23:48:03 GMT